
Criminal proceedings against Harry F. Sinclair, Edward L. Doheny and Albert H. Fall over leases on the Teapot Dome and Elk Hills naval oil reserves, set for November 22, may be delayed by a petition Sinclair and Fall filed in the supreme court attacking the dismissal of their challenge to the indictments.
WASHINGTON, Nov. 5. - (AP) - Criminal proceedings against Harry F. Sin-clair, Edward L. Doheny and Albert H. Fall, growing out of leases on the Teapot Dome and Elk Hills naval oil reserves, now set for November 22, may be delayed by a petition filed today in the supreme court by Sinclair and Fall. November 10 has been fixed as the date for appearance of the defendants in the District of Columbia supreme court to plead to the indictments, but it is expected that counsel for Sinclair and Fall will call the trial court's attention to the effort to get the highest court to pass on the validity of the indictment,
The supreme court is now in recess and since it will not convene until November 22, the earliest possible date it can act on the petition will be November 29, and it may be that the trial court will decide to suspend proceedings until it knows what the supreme court will do.
The indictments were originally challenged in the trial court because of the absence of certain persons in the grand jury room. The trial court sustained them and an appeal was taken to the court of appeals.
Congress later passed the Walsh act, taking away from the court the right tn entertain such appeals, and a month later it dismissed the action. Sinclair and Fall, in their petition filed in the supreme court today, attacked hte dismissal on the ground that the appellate court had given the law a retroactive construction. Counsel for Doheny, however, do not plan to attack the vality of the indictment in the supreme court, and today announced readiness to proceed when the criminal cases are called for trial. United States Attorney Peyton Gordon and the government's special oil counsel, Atlee Pomerene and Owen J. Roberts, meanwhile filed in the District of Columbia court of appeals today a brief in support of their motion to dismiss the special appeal allowed August 29, 1924, to Sinclair in the case in which he is accused of contempt to the United States senate because of his refusal to answer (Continued on Page Eight)
Reproduced unchanged from Douglas Daily Dispatch, November 6, 1926, page 1.
This text reflects the language, attitudes and errors of its time. A Century Late publishes it as a historical document.
Text: read from the Library of Congress scan by A Century Late, within the article boundaries of American Stories (Dell et al., 2023), DOI 10.57967/hf/0757.
November 5, 1926. The original articles, with the text exactly as it appeared and scans of the original newspaper pages, from that day’s editions of the following publications:Douglas Daily Dispatch, The Coconino Sun, Daily Kennebec Journal, Evening Star, and The Independent.
Receive the original news from the press of 100 years ago, daily, weekly or monthly. Subscribe by December 1, 2026 and get
20% off for life!
November 6, 1926. The original articles, with the text exactly as it appeared and scans of the original newspaper pages, from that day’s editions of the following publications:Imperial Valley Press, Douglas Daily Dispatch, The Broad Ax, The Indianapolis Times, Daily Kennebec Journal, Brownsville Herald, Evening Star, The McCarthy Weekly News, and The Daily Worker.
Criminal proceedings against Harry F. Sinclair, Edward L. Doheny and Albert H. Fall over leases on the Teapot Dome and Elk Hills naval oil reserves, set for November 22, may be delayed by a petition Sinclair and Fall filed in the supreme court attacking the dismissal of their challenge to the indictments.
WASHINGTON, Nov. 5. - (AP) - Criminal proceedings against Harry F. Sin-clair, Edward L. Doheny and Albert H. Fall, growing out of leases on the Teapot Dome and Elk Hills naval oil reserves, now set for November 22, may be delayed by a petition filed today in the supreme court by Sinclair and Fall. November 10 has been fixed as the date for appearance of the defendants in the District of Columbia supreme court to plead to the indictments, but it is expected that counsel for Sinclair and Fall will call the trial court's attention to the effort to get the highest court to pass on the validity of the indictment,
The supreme court is now in recess and since it will not convene until November 22, the earliest possible date it can act on the petition will be November 29, and it may be that the trial court will decide to suspend proceedings until it knows what the supreme court will do.
The indictments were originally challenged in the trial court because of the absence of certain persons in the grand jury room. The trial court sustained them and an appeal was taken to the court of appeals.
Congress later passed the Walsh act, taking away from the court the right tn entertain such appeals, and a month later it dismissed the action. Sinclair and Fall, in their petition filed in the supreme court today, attacked hte dismissal on the ground that the appellate court had given the law a retroactive construction. Counsel for Doheny, however, do not plan to attack the vality of the indictment in the supreme court, and today announced readiness to proceed when the criminal cases are called for trial. United States Attorney Peyton Gordon and the government's special oil counsel, Atlee Pomerene and Owen J. Roberts, meanwhile filed in the District of Columbia court of appeals today a brief in support of their motion to dismiss the special appeal allowed August 29, 1924, to Sinclair in the case in which he is accused of contempt to the United States senate because of his refusal to answer (Continued on Page Eight)
Reproduced unchanged from Douglas Daily Dispatch, November 6, 1926, page 1.
This text reflects the language, attitudes and errors of its time. A Century Late publishes it as a historical document.
Text: read from the Library of Congress scan by A Century Late, within the article boundaries of American Stories (Dell et al., 2023), DOI 10.57967/hf/0757.
Reproduced unchanged from Douglas Daily Dispatch, November 6, 1926, page 1.
This text reflects the language, attitudes and errors of its time. A Century Late publishes it as a historical document.
Text: read from the Library of Congress scan by A Century Late, within the article boundaries of American Stories (Dell et al., 2023), DOI 10.57967/hf/0757.
November 5, 1926. The original articles, with the text exactly as it appeared and scans of the original newspaper pages, from that day’s editions of the following publications:Douglas Daily Dispatch, The Coconino Sun, Daily Kennebec Journal, Evening Star, and The Independent.
Receive the original news from the press of 100 years ago, daily, weekly or monthly. Subscribe by December 1, 2026 and get
20% off for life!
November 6, 1926. The original articles, with the text exactly as it appeared and scans of the original newspaper pages, from that day’s editions of the following publications:Imperial Valley Press, Douglas Daily Dispatch, The Broad Ax, The Indianapolis Times, Daily Kennebec Journal, Brownsville Herald, Evening Star, The McCarthy Weekly News, and The Daily Worker.
Criminal proceedings against Harry F. Sinclair, Edward L. Doheny and Albert H. Fall over leases on the Teapot Dome and Elk Hills naval oil reserves, set for November 22, may be delayed by a petition Sinclair and Fall filed in the supreme court attacking the dismissal of their challenge to the indictments.
WASHINGTON, Nov. 5. - (AP) - Criminal proceedings against Harry F. Sin-clair, Edward L. Doheny and Albert H. Fall, growing out of leases on the Teapot Dome and Elk Hills naval oil reserves, now set for November 22, may be delayed by a petition filed today in the supreme court by Sinclair and Fall. November 10 has been fixed as the date for appearance of the defendants in the District of Columbia supreme court to plead to the indictments, but it is expected that counsel for Sinclair and Fall will call the trial court's attention to the effort to get the highest court to pass on the validity of the indictment,
The supreme court is now in recess and since it will not convene until November 22, the earliest possible date it can act on the petition will be November 29, and it may be that the trial court will decide to suspend proceedings until it knows what the supreme court will do.
The indictments were originally challenged in the trial court because of the absence of certain persons in the grand jury room. The trial court sustained them and an appeal was taken to the court of appeals.
Congress later passed the Walsh act, taking away from the court the right tn entertain such appeals, and a month later it dismissed the action. Sinclair and Fall, in their petition filed in the supreme court today, attacked hte dismissal on the ground that the appellate court had given the law a retroactive construction. Counsel for Doheny, however, do not plan to attack the vality of the indictment in the supreme court, and today announced readiness to proceed when the criminal cases are called for trial. United States Attorney Peyton Gordon and the government's special oil counsel, Atlee Pomerene and Owen J. Roberts, meanwhile filed in the District of Columbia court of appeals today a brief in support of their motion to dismiss the special appeal allowed August 29, 1924, to Sinclair in the case in which he is accused of contempt to the United States senate because of his refusal to answer (Continued on Page Eight)
Reproduced unchanged from Douglas Daily Dispatch, November 6, 1926, page 1.
This text reflects the language, attitudes and errors of its time. A Century Late publishes it as a historical document.
Text: read from the Library of Congress scan by A Century Late, within the article boundaries of American Stories (Dell et al., 2023), DOI 10.57967/hf/0757.
Reproduced unchanged from Douglas Daily Dispatch, November 6, 1926, page 1.
This text reflects the language, attitudes and errors of its time. A Century Late publishes it as a historical document.
Text: read from the Library of Congress scan by A Century Late, within the article boundaries of American Stories (Dell et al., 2023), DOI 10.57967/hf/0757.
November 5, 1926. The original articles, with the text exactly as it appeared and scans of the original newspaper pages, from that day’s editions of the following publications:Douglas Daily Dispatch, The Coconino Sun, Daily Kennebec Journal, Evening Star, and The Independent.
Receive the original news from the press of 100 years ago, daily, weekly or monthly. Subscribe by December 1, 2026 and get
20% off for life!
November 6, 1926. The original articles, with the text exactly as it appeared and scans of the original newspaper pages, from that day’s editions of the following publications:Imperial Valley Press, Douglas Daily Dispatch, The Broad Ax, The Indianapolis Times, Daily Kennebec Journal, Brownsville Herald, Evening Star, The McCarthy Weekly News, and The Daily Worker.
Criminal proceedings against Harry F. Sinclair, Edward L. Doheny and Albert H. Fall over leases on the Teapot Dome and Elk Hills naval oil reserves, set for November 22, may be delayed by a petition Sinclair and Fall filed in the supreme court attacking the dismissal of their challenge to the indictments.
WASHINGTON, Nov. 5. - (AP) - Criminal proceedings against Harry F. Sin-clair, Edward L. Doheny and Albert H. Fall, growing out of leases on the Teapot Dome and Elk Hills naval oil reserves, now set for November 22, may be delayed by a petition filed today in the supreme court by Sinclair and Fall. November 10 has been fixed as the date for appearance of the defendants in the District of Columbia supreme court to plead to the indictments, but it is expected that counsel for Sinclair and Fall will call the trial court's attention to the effort to get the highest court to pass on the validity of the indictment,
The supreme court is now in recess and since it will not convene until November 22, the earliest possible date it can act on the petition will be November 29, and it may be that the trial court will decide to suspend proceedings until it knows what the supreme court will do.
The indictments were originally challenged in the trial court because of the absence of certain persons in the grand jury room. The trial court sustained them and an appeal was taken to the court of appeals.
Congress later passed the Walsh act, taking away from the court the right tn entertain such appeals, and a month later it dismissed the action. Sinclair and Fall, in their petition filed in the supreme court today, attacked hte dismissal on the ground that the appellate court had given the law a retroactive construction. Counsel for Doheny, however, do not plan to attack the vality of the indictment in the supreme court, and today announced readiness to proceed when the criminal cases are called for trial. United States Attorney Peyton Gordon and the government's special oil counsel, Atlee Pomerene and Owen J. Roberts, meanwhile filed in the District of Columbia court of appeals today a brief in support of their motion to dismiss the special appeal allowed August 29, 1924, to Sinclair in the case in which he is accused of contempt to the United States senate because of his refusal to answer (Continued on Page Eight)
Reproduced unchanged from Douglas Daily Dispatch, November 6, 1926, page 1.
This text reflects the language, attitudes and errors of its time. A Century Late publishes it as a historical document.
Text: read from the Library of Congress scan by A Century Late, within the article boundaries of American Stories (Dell et al., 2023), DOI 10.57967/hf/0757.
Reproduced unchanged from Douglas Daily Dispatch, November 6, 1926, page 1.
This text reflects the language, attitudes and errors of its time. A Century Late publishes it as a historical document.
Text: read from the Library of Congress scan by A Century Late, within the article boundaries of American Stories (Dell et al., 2023), DOI 10.57967/hf/0757.
November 5, 1926. The original articles, with the text exactly as it appeared and scans of the original newspaper pages, from that day’s editions of the following publications:Douglas Daily Dispatch, The Coconino Sun, Daily Kennebec Journal, Evening Star, and The Independent.
Receive the original news from the press of 100 years ago, daily, weekly or monthly. Subscribe by December 1, 2026 and get
20% off for life!
November 6, 1926. The original articles, with the text exactly as it appeared and scans of the original newspaper pages, from that day’s editions of the following publications:Imperial Valley Press, Douglas Daily Dispatch, The Broad Ax, The Indianapolis Times, Daily Kennebec Journal, Brownsville Herald, Evening Star, The McCarthy Weekly News, and The Daily Worker.
Criminal proceedings against Harry F. Sinclair, Edward L. Doheny and Albert H. Fall over leases on the Teapot Dome and Elk Hills naval oil reserves, set for November 22, may be delayed by a petition Sinclair and Fall filed in the supreme court attacking the dismissal of their challenge to the indictments.
WASHINGTON, Nov. 5. - (AP) - Criminal proceedings against Harry F. Sin-clair, Edward L. Doheny and Albert H. Fall, growing out of leases on the Teapot Dome and Elk Hills naval oil reserves, now set for November 22, may be delayed by a petition filed today in the supreme court by Sinclair and Fall. November 10 has been fixed as the date for appearance of the defendants in the District of Columbia supreme court to plead to the indictments, but it is expected that counsel for Sinclair and Fall will call the trial court's attention to the effort to get the highest court to pass on the validity of the indictment,
The supreme court is now in recess and since it will not convene until November 22, the earliest possible date it can act on the petition will be November 29, and it may be that the trial court will decide to suspend proceedings until it knows what the supreme court will do.
The indictments were originally challenged in the trial court because of the absence of certain persons in the grand jury room. The trial court sustained them and an appeal was taken to the court of appeals.
Congress later passed the Walsh act, taking away from the court the right tn entertain such appeals, and a month later it dismissed the action. Sinclair and Fall, in their petition filed in the supreme court today, attacked hte dismissal on the ground that the appellate court had given the law a retroactive construction. Counsel for Doheny, however, do not plan to attack the vality of the indictment in the supreme court, and today announced readiness to proceed when the criminal cases are called for trial. United States Attorney Peyton Gordon and the government's special oil counsel, Atlee Pomerene and Owen J. Roberts, meanwhile filed in the District of Columbia court of appeals today a brief in support of their motion to dismiss the special appeal allowed August 29, 1924, to Sinclair in the case in which he is accused of contempt to the United States senate because of his refusal to answer (Continued on Page Eight)
Reproduced unchanged from Douglas Daily Dispatch, November 6, 1926, page 1.
This text reflects the language, attitudes and errors of its time. A Century Late publishes it as a historical document.
Text: read from the Library of Congress scan by A Century Late, within the article boundaries of American Stories (Dell et al., 2023), DOI 10.57967/hf/0757.
Reproduced unchanged from Douglas Daily Dispatch, November 6, 1926, page 1.
This text reflects the language, attitudes and errors of its time. A Century Late publishes it as a historical document.
Text: read from the Library of Congress scan by A Century Late, within the article boundaries of American Stories (Dell et al., 2023), DOI 10.57967/hf/0757.
November 5, 1926. The original articles, with the text exactly as it appeared and scans of the original newspaper pages, from that day’s editions of the following publications:Douglas Daily Dispatch, The Coconino Sun, Daily Kennebec Journal, Evening Star, and The Independent.
Receive the original news from the press of 100 years ago, daily, weekly or monthly. Subscribe by December 1, 2026 and get
20% off for life!
November 6, 1926. The original articles, with the text exactly as it appeared and scans of the original newspaper pages, from that day’s editions of the following publications:Imperial Valley Press, Douglas Daily Dispatch, The Broad Ax, The Indianapolis Times, Daily Kennebec Journal, Brownsville Herald, Evening Star, The McCarthy Weekly News, and The Daily Worker.